Poetasters, dirty politicians, and also other liars soil the cosmos. Exposing them remains in mine toolkit. I review charlatans so girlfriend don't have to!


*

Introduction and Text the "Identity"

Julio Noboa Polanco's item of doggerel, titled "Identity," has come to be an web favorite; unfortunately, this clumsy verse employs the use of hyperbole that outcomes in nonsense. The function of exaggeration is come emphasize the characteristics of some entity or event, not to pervert the subject into something it is not. For example, one’s thoughts may be hyperbolically expressed together soaring prefer an eagle. But if one locations those think in the mental of a weed clinging to a cliff, the opportunity of flight becomes impossible. That ludicrous comparison appears in the second versagraph that this poem: "I'd quite be a tall, ugly weed, / clinging ~ above cliffs, favor an eagle / wind-wavering above high, jagged rocks."


The design template of the piece centers on the really human and admirable desire because that freedom and individuality. The speaker, therefore, is asserting the unlike every the misguided souls who select to live a disciplined life, this speak proudly announces the he prefers to remain a rowdy rebel, yet the speaker regrettably chooses to compare himself and his compatriots come plants. The desire for liberty precludes the desire to be an reality that is rooted to ground.

You are watching: Identity by julio noboa polanco answers


A perverted kind of appropriateness is afloat in the fact that the versagraphs remain uneven in the ~ do so poem. Technological skill and logic are both severely lacking in the internet sensation.


Identity

Let them be together flowers, always watered, fed, guarded, admired, however harnessed come a pot that dirt.

I'd quite be a tall, ugly weed, clinging ~ above cliffs, choose an eagle wind-wavering over high, jagged rocks.

To have broken through the surface of stone, come live, to feel exposed come the wildly of the vast, eternal sky. To be swayed by the breezes of an ancient sea, transferring my soul, mine seed, beyond the hills of time or into the abyss of the bizarre.

I'd fairly be unseen, and also if climate shunned by everyone, 보다 to it is in a pleasant-smelling flower, cultivation in clusters in the fertile valley, wherein they're praised, handled, and plucked through greedy, human being hands.


I'd rather smell of musty, environment-friendly stench than of sweet, fragrant lilac. If I could stand alone, solid and free, I'd rather be a tall, ugly weed.

Reading that "Identity"


Commentary

In Julio Noboa Polanco's "Identity," the expression that the heartfelt desire for freedom and individuality stays shrouded behind blended metaphors and the inappropriate usage of hyperbole.

First Movement: Ludicrous Dichotomy and also Mixed Metaphor

Let castle be as flowers, constantly watered, fed, guarded, admired, yet harnessed come a pot the dirt.

I'd quite be a tall, ugly weed, clinging top top cliffs, favor an eagle wind-wavering above high, jagged rocks.

The speaker concocts a perverted dichotomy between himself and his fellows, who he identifies simply as "them." leaving those others, "them," unidentified, however, the speaker takes as his job to castigate those who perform not agree through his details brand of flexibility philosophy.

The speaker's opening lines mix a metaphor of flower and also horse. Those other people, whom the speaker disdains, are favor well-kept flowers in a flower pot, but he states they are "harnessed to a pot that dirt." steeds are harnessed, no flowers. His mixed an allegory betrays the item as nonsense. Blended metaphors cannot communicate accurately, together the mix creates only confusion and also disorder.


The first part of the dichotomy is the flower, and also the 2nd is a weed; thus, the speak is do the efforts to convince his readers the being a weed is much better than being a flower. He cases that that prefers to it is in a big ugly weed, and he likens that ugly weed, which also lives fastened come dirt simply as the flower in a pot does, come an eagle. The absence of logic below is breathtaking: eagles fly, plants carry out not! the matters no that the plant resides admired in a pot or grows out on the prairie unseen by anyone; neither will ever takes wings and fly away as the eagle absolutely will. Again, a combined metaphor, below expressed together a simile, has actually resulted in nothing however confusion.


Second Movement: The Curse the Postmod Gibberish

To have broken through the surface of stone, to live, to feel exposed come the insanity of the vast, eternal sky. To it is in swayed through the breezes of an old sea, moving my soul, mine seed, past the mountains of time or right into the abyss the the bizarre.

The speak then offers a series of infinitives, "to have actually broken," "to feel," "to live," and also "to be swayed." The very first infinitive defines the activity of a saxifrage, a plant that has actually burst v some hard surface like concrete or "stone." The speaker supplies no context for such one action, which go not accordingly describe any activity a person being might take.

But the speaker appears to think that breaking with that stony surface ar will allow him "to live." and apparently come him, living is gift "exposed to the wildly / the the vast eternal sky." Tell that to victim of tornadoes, hurricanes, and also other severe, disastrous storms that maim and also kill. Much from enabling him to live, the "madness" could kill him instead.


In a vague, meaningless, and also stupendously absurd claim, the speaker asserts the he would prefer his "soul" and also his "seed" to be carried by the winds of "an ancient sea" to some "abyss that the bizarre" which apparently exists "beyond the mountains of time." Again, the effort at hyperbole continues to be nonsensical. If he is a weed, his seed may be carried far and wide by the wind. But trying to make the locations where the seed could land into "an old sea" "beyond the mountains of time" create a vagueness that continues to be unrealizable.

The "abyss that the bizarre" opens up the hyperbolic cruising on the wind come the level of an absurd abstraction. The poetaster is clearly striving come sound profound but fails to even offer picture that can be perceived.

Third Movement: Confusion and Contradiction

I'd quite be unseen, and if climate shunned through everyone, than to be a pleasant-smelling flower, farming in swarm in the productive valley, where they're praised, handled, and plucked through greedy, person hands.


There shows up to it is in a structural error in the opening line in the movement. The "and if" seems to it is in dangling, providing no an interpretation and only confusing what the speaker is trying to say. Probably he method "or," but actually omitting the phrase can enhance meaning somewhat.

The speaker has currently claimed that would choose to be a weed growing wild and totally free than to it is in a tree in a pot. Currently the speaker claims he would prefer to be invisible than to it is in a "pleasant-smelling flower" even if the flower is growing in a "fertile valley." This insurance claim throws a ridiculous contradiction into the mix. He wanted to a weed come a flower in a pot since the weed is out farming somewhere in nature. Yet now he's denigrating even flowers that flourish wild.


Fourth Movement: A Stinky Weed

I'd quite smell that musty, green stench than of sweet, fragrant lilac. If I might stand alone, strong and free, I'd fairly be a tall, ugly weed.

See more: W Is It Illegal To Pick Cattails In Wisconsin ? Is It Illegal To Pick Cattails In Wisconsin

The speaker has actually now returned to his desire to be a weed—and a stinky weed at that. He would favor to stink and "stand alone" 보다 to it is in a sweet smelling lilac. The fancies the those ugly, tall, stinky weeds have much more freedom than sweet-smelling flowers that humans enjoy. The id is ludicrous. A weed walk not, in fact, possess more freedom, no one is the stronger, 보다 a flower.

Of course, everyone prefers come live together a being that possesses strength and also freedom. Thus, this would-be poet’s instinct for freedom is well-grounded and also even admirable, however unfortunately his execution the this poem remains a hyperbolic disaster.